Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks.

By Patti M. Valkenburg, Jochen Peter. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2011

1,065 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1da9ab420abb6767d57a9f07929a70723e0c4aef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can You Guess Who I Am? Real, Ideal, and False Self-Presentation on Facebook Among Emerging Adults (2015, background): “Consistent with Valkenburg and Peter (2011), we take the position that the current psychosocial state of the young person drives online self-presentation; albeit online behaviors can also enhance or reduce psychosocial well-being.”
The Social Media Disorder Scale (2016, neutral): “Since SMD can be expected to be particularly disturbing for the psychosocial development of adolescents (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011), the SMD scale will be tuned to adolescents.”
Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence (2019, background): “Therefore, SNSs can assist users’ self-presentation and self-disclosure (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011).”
Developing and Validating the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self‐Determination Perspective (2013, background): “To learn social lessons on how to behave, they often rely on entertainment media and the Internet (e.g., Valkenburg, 2004; Valkenburg & Peter, 2011).”
A Comparison of Preservice Teachers’ Responses to Cyber Versus Traditional Bullying Scenarios (2014, background): “…degree of “editability” or being able to reflect on the actions/words used to maximize distress being greater for cyber than for traditional bullying (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011), and (e) the potentially much larger audience for cyber bullying than for traditional bullying (Slonje & Smith, 2008).”
Emerging adults' social media self-presentation and identity development at college transition: Mindfulness as a moderator (2017, background): “MARK identity clarity (Campbell et al., 1996; Valkenburg & Peter, 2011).”
The Impact of Internet Pornography on Adolescents: A Review of the Research (2012, background): “While they do not address the issue of pornography, Valkenburg and Peter (2011) asserted that communicating with others online may provide adolescents with increased degrees of self-esteem.”
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp (2017, positive): “Social media have been argued to be especially suited for young people to practice self-disclosure (Livingstone, 2008; Valkenburg and Peter, 2011), although other studies have not found any age differences in self-expressions online (e.”
Media Effects: Theory and Research. (2016, background): “This enhanced online self-disclosure, in turn, Media Effects 27 stimulated the quality of their friendships, albeit only when adolescents used social media to communicate primarily with their existing friends and not when they used it primarily to chat with strangers (Valkenburg & Peter 2009, 2011).”
The Digital Self: How Social Media Serves as a Setting that Shapes Youth’s Emotional Experiences (2015, background): “Similarly, Valkenburg and Peter (2011) report that friendship formation and quality are enhanced by online communication.”
“Media Time = Family Time” (2014, positive): “…can strengthen other relationships during adolescence, such as friendships or romantic partners (Blair & Fletcher, 2010; Blais, Craig, Pepler, & Connolly, 2008; Coyne, Stockdale, Busby, Iverson, & Grant, 2011; Punamäki, Wallenius, Hölttö, Nygård, & Rimpelä, 2009; Valkenburg & Peter, 2009, 2011).”
Disguised Distress in Children and Adolescents “Flying Under The Radar” (2013, background): “According to Valkenburg and Peter (2011), online communication among young people is highly amenable to self-presentation.”
Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, background): “The second causal mechanism fostered by anonymity is deindividuation, which is “the loss of one’s sense of individuality and personal responsibility” (Valkenburg & Peter 2011, p. 122).”
Technological addictions and social connectedness: predictor effect of internet addiction, social media addiction, digital game addiction and smartphone addiction on social connectedness (2017, background): “This makes the adolescents more vulnerable to technological addictions (63).”
A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media (2017, result): “This may represent the proliferation of use of online and mobile technologies by adolescents, in comparison with adults (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011).”