Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence

By Markus Appel, Caroline Marker, Timo Gnambs. Review of General Psychology, 2019

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A growing number of studies have examined the psychological corollaries of using social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter (often called social media). The interdisciplinary research area and conflicting evidence from primary studies complicate the assessment of current scholarly knowledge in this field of high public attention. We review meta-analytic evidence on three hotly debated topics regarding the effects of SNSs: well-being, academic achievement, and narcissism. Meta-analyses from different laboratories draw a rather equivocal picture. They show small associations in the r = .10 range between the intensity of SNS use and loneliness, self-esteem, life satisfaction, or self-reported depression, and somewhat stronger links to a thin body ideal and higher social capital. There is no indication for potential devastating effects of social media on school achievement; social media use and school grades are unrelated for adolescents. The meta-analyses revealed small to moderate associations between narcissism and SNS use. In sum, meta-analytic evidence is not in support of dramatic claims relating social media use to mischief.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbd4f71d3c79a5521394000d393dd6917cb231b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Adrian Meier
  2. Leonard Reinecke

In Social Psychology

  1. Adrian Meier
  2. Leonard Reinecke

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Adrian Meier
  2. Leonard Reinecke

Citations in the corpus