Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process

By Thomas L. Saaty, M. S. Özdemir. 2003

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process (2011, background): “The possibility to integrate negative values in the scale has been also explored (Millet & Schoner, 2005; T. Saaty & Ozdemir, 2003).”
Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes (2006, background): “Although one does not speak of negative probability, even as one may subtract a probability value from another as in subtracting probabilities from one, often one needs to use negative priorities [13].”
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, background): “The possibility to integrate negative values in the scale has been also explored (Saaty and Ozdemir, 2003; Millet and Schoner, 2005).”
Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using Geographical Information Systems based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis (2006, background): “In many decision problems, four kinds of concerns are considered: benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR); in which the first two are advantageous, and hence, are positive and the second two are disadvantageous and are therefore negative (Saaty and Özdemir, 2003).”