Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes

By Thomas L. Saaty. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, background): “This phenomenon has been criticized from one side (Dyer, 1990a, b; Holder, 1990, 1991; Stam and Duarte Silva, 2003) and legitimized by another (Saaty, 1986, 1990, 1991, 1994, 1995, 2006; Harker and Vargas, 1987, 1990 ; Pe´rez, 1995).”
An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (2013, methodology): “Like the relationship between MAUT and MAVT, the analytic network process (see Saaty, 2006) is an extension of AHP.”
Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using Geographical Information Systems based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis (2006, methodology): “For the assignment of weight and rank values, the comparison judgments scale from Saaty (2006) was used, as given in Table 3 with their corresponding meanings.”