Single-case and Small-n Experimental Designs : A Practical Guide To Randomization Tests
By J. Todman, P. Dugard. 2001
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d3f5714a40379babd13d425dad20b188466da46
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Mieke Heyvaert
- Patrick Onghena
- W. Shadish
- W. Van den Noortgate
- R. Horner
- S. Odom
- D. Rindskopf
- John H. Hitchcock
Citations in the corpus
- Randomization tests for single-case experiments: State of the art, state of the science, and state of the application (2014, methodology): “…impact of SCE research is the present-day availability of several methods for the design and analysis of SCE research (cf. Barlow et al., 2009; Dugard et al., 2012; Edgington & Onghena, 2007, pp. 225- 259; Franklin, Allison, & Gorman, 1996; Kazdin, 2011; Parker, Vannest, & Davis, 2011), as…”
- Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards (2013, methodology): “Responseguided procedures (in contrast, to either an a priori decision or determining the intervention point at random) have been criticized for introducing bias and increasing Type I errors in the research (Ferron & Jones, 2006; Todman & Dugard, 2001).”
- Transporting an evidence-based classroom management program for preschoolers with disruptive behavior problems to a school: An analysis of implementation, outcomes, and contextual variables. (2007, unknown): “…documenting when the baseline ended and the intervention was introduced, a significant result does not allow for any inferences regarding which students were most affected, or which of the two training conditions was more effective in reducing challenging classroom behavior (Todman & Dugard, 2001).”
- The Aggregation of Single-Case Results Using Hierarchical Linear Models. (2007, methodology): “Finally, we note that if the treatment is randomly assigned to measurement occasions or if the phase change is randomly chosen, a nonparametric randomization test can be used to evaluate the treatment effect (Edgington & Onghena, 2007; Ferron & Onghena, 1996; Todman & Dugard, 2001).”