Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?

By S. Schmukle, Boris Egloff. 2004

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ca91e533cc0e27348366fc735dcecd544d8a434

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? (2005, background): “Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3 – 22. Smith, E. C., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Re”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “This indicates that these measures appear to be sensitive enough to capture meaningful state influences on impulse strength over and above stable (trait) sources of variance (e.g., Schmukle & Egloff, 2004).”
Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective (2009, background): “…have been shown to be sensitive to fluctuations in bodily need states such as deprivation (Seibt et al., 2007), suggesting that these measures are sensitive enough to capture meaningful state influences on impulse strength over and above a stable trait component (e.g., Schmukle & Egloff, 2004).”
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice (2006, background): “Recent research has shown that implicit preferences, as measured with different versions of the IAT, include both stable traitlike as well as occasion-specific variance (Schmukle & Egloff, 2004, 2005).”
When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, unknown): “Remarkably, some implicit measures predicted behaviour over a time span of 2 weeks and more (Hermsen et al, 2006; Hofmann et al, 2008a , 2008b ), lending further support to the notion that implicit measures in part capture stable variance (Schmukle & Egloff, 2004 ).”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, methodology): “Egloff, Schmukle, and colleagues have conducted the most thorough tests of internal consistency and test–retest reliability of IAT measures (Egloff, Schwerdtfeger, & Schmukle, 2005; Schmukle & Egloff, 2004, 2005).”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, unknown): “…(cf. Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001; Egloff, Schwerdtfeger, & Schmukle, 2005; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, in press; Schmukle & Egloff, 2004), often treating the IAT as a unitary category, like a standardised diagnostic procedure.”
Reliability of Implicit Self–Esteem Measures Revisited (2011, methodology): “According to the naming convention of Sriram and Greenwald (2009), the first self-esteem BIAT (4)For peer-reported self-esteem, we included only participants who were evaluated by both other people (N 1⁄4 89).”