Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective

By Wilhelm Hofmann, Malte Friese, F. Strack. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009

1,401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01bb2752a7444e2822d0ca456ba06f32dbd26d87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Procrastination out of Habit? The Role of Impulsive Versus Reflective Media Selection in Procrastinatory Media Use (2018, methodology): “, a habitual response) or also an immediate automatic affective reaction is evoked (i.e., an impulsive response; Hofmann et al., 2009).”
A Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of Self-Control Measures (2011, neutral): “Collectively, this evidence is consistent with dual-system models of self-control positing impulsegenerating and impulse-controlling systems (Carver et al., 2009; Eisenberg et al., 2004: Hofmann et al., 2009; Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999; Steinberg, 2008).”
Resisting Everything except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain–specific Impulsivity (2012, background): “As predicted by the model of Hofmann et al. (2009), temptation had a weaker effect and perceived harm had a stronger effect for individuals with higher self-control; that is, more self-controlled individuals are better at overcoming their idiosyncratic temptations and refraining from behaviours…”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “We will suggest that a more balanced approach should consider the two sides of the self-control conflict equally, both in terms of theoretical integration and empirical assessment (see also Hofmann, Friese, & Strack, 2009 ).”
Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology (2012, background): “From a dual processing perspective, Hofmann et al. (2009) expanded the RIM by outlining a framework for the prediction of self-control outcomes based on impulsive and reflective antecedents, as well as dispositional and situational boundary conditions.”