The Economics of Sin
By S. Cameron. 2002
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c6965494765d45916070b3070ecdc26246d4fac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
- Arica Crootof
- M. Mayfield
- Tamee R Albrecht
- Robert Eastwood
- M. Lipton
- Xinyi Zhou
- Christopher A. Scott
- J. Mayfield
Citations in the corpus
- The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment (2018, methodology): “If computational models provide the ability to test realistic options (Endo et al 2015), this combined approach can be useful for linking nexus assessments with decision-making (e.g. Ringler et al 2016, Topi et al 2016, van Vuuren et al 2015).”
- Pro-poor Growth and Pro-growth Poverty Reduction: Meaning, Evidence, and Policy Implications (2000, background): “Thornton (1848) and Mill (cited in Hollander 1985, 846-7) made the case in the 19th century; modern micro-level evidence confirms it (Binswanger et al.1995, Lipton 1993).”
- Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability (2015, background): “…job guarantee, socialization of care, public control over the creation of money, reduction of working hours and work sharing can secure a basic level of subsistence for all and liberate time from paid work, thus expanding voluntary and convivial activity and autonomy (Kallis et al. 2012, 2014).”
- The Relationship Between Leader Motivating Language and Self-Efficacy (2012, background): “Case in point: Downsizing has been evaluated to be a general failure as a cost saving measure, with an average success rate of about 10% in most cases (Cameron, 2002; Cascio, 2000, 2006).”
- A Survey of Fake News (2020, background): “…propagated through media, carrying false information regardless of the means and motives behind it,” which overlaps with false news, dis-information [Kshetri and Voas 2017], misinformation [Kucharski 2016], satire news [Rubin et al. 2015], or even the stories that a person does not like…”