Making Reliability Reliable

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement (2018, methodology): “Thus, we encourage researchers to employ the procedures described by Geldhof et al. in their article (Mplus syntax is provided) to estimate and report multilevel reliabilities for their Level 1 measures, identifying the specific type of reliability calculated (see also Cho, 2016).”
An empirical analysis of alleged misunderstandings of coefficient alpha (2018, background): “To be clear, both sides in this debate seem to agree that simply always using coefficient alpha, as seems to be standard practice for many, is unjustified (Cho, 2016).”
Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them (2021, background): “, 2014; McNeish, 2018), science education (Taber, 2018), organizational research (Cho, 2016), clinical neuropsychology (Watkins, 2017), poverty measurement (Nájera Catalán, 2019), and statistics (Şimşek & Noyan, 2013).”