Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support.

By T. Wilcox, Derrick J. Zwickl, Tracy A. Heath, D. Hillis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2002

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ba44a0d82a01538d12ff086ec28b7e3eb92e4d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Parallel adaptive radiations in arid and temperate Australia: molecular phylogeography and systematics of the Egernia whitii (Lacertilia: Scincidae) species group (2004, methodology): “Nevertheless, they serve as an additional source of information on branch support and may represent a better estimate of phylogenetic accuracy (Wilcox et al., 2002; Reeder, 2003).”
A molecular phylogeny of the genus Apis suggests that the Giant Honey Bee of the Philippines, A. breviligula Maa, and the Plains Honey Bee of southern India, A. indica Fabricius, are valid species (2010, background): “95, which is regarded as significant (Wilcox et al., 2002).”
Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics (2008, methodology): “Although the performance of Bayesian phylogenetic methods has become relatively well understood through a large number of simulation studies (e.g., Suzuki et al., 2002; Wilcox et al., 2002; Alfaro et al., 2003; Cummings et al., 2003; Douady et al., 2003; Erixon et al., 2003; Huelsenbeck & Rannala,”
Molecular Phylogenetic Relationships and Morphological Evolution in the Heterosporous Fern Genus Marsilea (2007, methodology): “Conflict among the resultant phylogenies was assessed according to a 70% bootstrap criterion for both MP and ML, and a 0.95 posterior probability measure for BI (MasonGamer and Kellogg 1996; Wilcox et al. 2002).”
Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. (2003, unknown): “4; Wilcox et al. 2002).”
Incorporating molecular evolution into phylogenetic analysis, and a new compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers for animal mitochondrial DNA (2006, methodology): “This observation was made from both empirical (e.g., Buckley et al. 2002, Wilcox et al. 2002) and simulated data (e.g., Cummings et al. 2003, Suzuki et al. 2002, Wilcox et al. 2002).”
A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. (2004, background): “Although posterior probabilities may be over-credible as measures of clade support (Suzuki et al., 2002) and currently are a subject of debate (Wilcox et al., 2002; Alfaro et al., 2003), we have observed that high Bayesian posterior probabilities often support nodes that are otherwise also detected…”
Molecular systematics of armadillos (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae): contribution of maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. (2003, unknown): “This propensity has been noted by other authors, who tried to compare the two measures of phylogenetic support (Leach e and Reeder, 2002; Whittingham et al., 2002; Wilcox et al., 2002).”
Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. (2005, methodology): “Thus, the Bayes factor is a method for determining whether a specific partitioning strategy is superior to another and evaluates the trade-off between increasing overall partition number (and thus number of estimated parameters) and minimizing random error.”
Discordant mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies in emydid turtles: implications for speciation and conservation (2010, methodology): “Clades with posterior probabilities (Pp) 0.95 were considered as strongly supported (Wilcox et al., 2002; Alfaro, Zoller & Lutzoni, 2003; Erixon et al., 2003; Huelsenbeck & Rannala, 2004).”
Twelve new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from isolated limestone habitats in east-central and southern Myanmar demonstrate high localized diversity and unprecedented microendemism (2018, background): “95 and above were considered well-supported (Huelsenbeck et al., 2001; Wilcox et al., 2002).”