Discordant mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies in emydid turtles: implications for speciation and conservation

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A large phylogeny of turtles (Testudines) using molecular data (2012, background): “Our results on Deirochelyinae are in good agreement with previous topologies (Stephens and Wiens, 2003, 2009; Wiens et al., 2010), but differ from those reported by Spinks et al. (2009), using seven nuclear loci including R35 and RAG1.”
Molecular phylogeny of Central and South American slider turtles: implications for biogeography and systematics (Testudines: Emydidae: Trachemys) (2012, background): “…mitochondrial genes and five nuclear loci that had been shown to reveal phylogenetic relationships and differences among terminal chelonian taxa (e.g. Le et al. 2007; Fritz and Bininda-Emonds 2007; Fritz et al. 2008a, 2010a; Vargas-Ramı́rez et al. 2008, 2010b; Wiens et al. 2010) were chosen.”
Combining Geometric Morphometrics and Finite Element Analysis with Evolutionary Modeling: Towards a Synthesis (2016, background): “Phylogeny and original branch lengths are from Wiens et al. (2010), the same phylogeny used by Stayton (2011).”