A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family.

By M. Wojciechowski, M. Lavin, Michael J. Sanderson. American-Eurasian journal of botany, 2004

837 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7153ed9bb2fd901ec86fa149bf5c43230474f98f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes (2013, positive): “The Papilionoideae and Mimosoideae, excluding Dinizia Ducke, were each strongly supported as monophyletic and nested within a paraphyletic Caesalpinioideae (Fig.”
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. (2009, methodology): “…still unclear (as represented by angled line), but one strong possibility for the timing of this event is indicated by the slash mark on the tree; the location of the loss of the chloroplast inverted repeat is also indicted by a slash mark; summary tree modifi ed from Wojciechowski et al. (2004) .”
Plastid genome sequences of legumes reveal parallel inversions and multiple losses of rps16 in papilionoids (2015, background): “Within Fabaceae, most size variation has been attributed to the loss of the IR in one clade of the papilionoids, the IR Lacking Clade (IRLC) (Wojciechowski et al., 2004).”
The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species (2011, background): “Tribe Ingeae has repeatedly been shown to be paraphyletic, with Acacia sensu stricto nested within it (Brown et al., 2008; Dayanandan et al., 1997; Lavin et al., 2005; Luckow et al., 2003, 2000; Miller et al., 2003a, 2003b; Miller & Bayer, 2000, 2001, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004).”
An overview of peanut and its wild relatives (2011, background): “1; Wojciechowski et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 2005).”
Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus (2010, background): “Vicieae) is considered one of the most advanced groups in the legumes (Kupicha, 1981; Steele and Wojciechowski, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004; Lock and Maxted, 2005), and one of the most recently evolved.”
Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. (2005, methodology): “…support levels for the entire Fabales crown (i.e., the MRCA of Quillaja, Surianaceae, Polygalaceae, and Leguminosae; sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003) or many of the older crown clades within legumes (Bruneau et al., 2001; Kajita et al., 2001; Wojciechowski, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004).”
Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding (2015, methodology): “The clade is considered one of the youngest tribes among legumes (Kupicha, 1981; Steele and Wojciechowski, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004; Lock and Maxted, 2005), and estimates based on rates of evolution in the maturase K chloroplast gene place the age of the crown node at 17.”
The maximum relative growth rate of common UK plant species is positively associated with their global invasiveness (2011, background): “, 2006), Fabaceae (Wojciechowski et al., 2004), Polygonaceae (Lamb Frye & Kron, 2003) and Poaceae (Bouchenak-Khelladi et al.”
Phylogenetic Analysis of the Plastid Inverted Repeat for 244 Species: Insights into Deeper-Level Angiosperm Relationships from a Long, Slowly Evolving Sequence Region (2011, background): “…by Cicer, Medicago, and Trifolium in the 244-taxon tree)—are known to have completely or essentially completely lost the IR (Raubeson and Jansen 1992; Wojciechowski et al. 2004; Jansen et al. 2008), and these two groups are indeed characterized by extremely long branches in the IR ML tree (fig.”