Qualitative Inquiry in the History of Psychology

By Fredrick J. Wertz. 2014

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a5eb813f38573784958404b1d7ec2d7d4eb3ca6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

1. H. Levitt
2. Susan L. Morrow
3. Fredrick J. Wertz
4. J. Ponterotto
5. R. Beattie
6. R. Hamlin
7. Andrea D. Ellinger
8. I. Grieger

In Social Psychology

1. J. Ponterotto
2. H. Levitt
3. Susan L. Morrow
4. Fredrick J. Wertz
5. Sue L. Motulsky
6. Christine J. Yeh
7. A. Inman
8. Victoria Clarke

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020, unknown): “For example, Wertz (2014) describes how the field shifted away from its roots in qualitative methods in the mid-1900s as hypothesis testing and positivism were emphasized by behaviorism.”
• Recommendations for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity (2017, background): “Although it is not possible to review their history in the present paper, descriptions of the development of qualitative research methods in human science can be traced to precursors of modern psychology, such as Wundt, Vico, Dilthey, and James (Danziger, 1990; Wertz, 2014).”