Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.

By Cameron Anderson, Oliver P. John, Dacher Keltner, A. Kring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001

1,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a531d185943b257f429317e3780b2ff6552da3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents (2016, background): “The other type of referent social power is based on social status, which is defined as a representation of an individual’s social prominence and respect [1].”
Viewing usage of counterfeit luxury goods: Social identity and social hierarchy effects on dilution and enhancement of genuine luxury brands (2016, background): “Lower-ranked individuals are more likely to accept such changes (Anderson et al., 2001; Keltner et al., 2003).”
The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity (2011, background): “Moreover, power-based self-concept consistency was independent of ethnic differences associated with self-concept consistency across contexts (English & Chen, 2007), personality characteristics associated with elevated status (Anderson et al., 2001), and self-esteem across the three studies.”
Bullying and the Big Five (2003, background): “Perhaps children who exhibit high levels of Extraversion and Agreeableness would be more popular (as are adults who exhibit high levels of Extraversion; Anderson et al., 2001) and therefore more inclined to help others than their less Extraverted or Agreeable peers, because they are not afraid of lo”
The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences (2010, result): “In the dormitory study described above, Anderson et al. (2001) also collected self ratings of status from a subset of participants, and these self ratings correlated significantly with peer ratings.”
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008, background): “Influence has also been described as a dimension of status (Anderson et al., 2001; Berger et al., 1977; Ridgeway & Correll, 2006).”
The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. (2006, methodology): “In doing so, I adopt a deWnition of status used in prior research: Status is the extent to which an individual in a group is seen as prominent, respected, and inXuential by other group members ( Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001 ).”
Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the Big Five and the general factor of personality (2010, result): “The role of Emotional Stability in social status is also in line with Anderson et al. (2001) and with Mervielde and de Fruyt (2000).”
How coworkers attribute, react to, and shape job crafting (2019, background): “As a consequence, the job crafter who holds a lower social status will be more likely to pay attention to this feedback and will be more susceptible to the influence of the coworker (cf. Anderson et al., 2001; Fiske, 1993).”