A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Locus of Causality in Exercise, Sport, and Physical Education Contexts.

By Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis, Martin S. Hagger, Stuart J. H. Biddle, Brett W. Smith, C. K. John Wang. 2003

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The present article conducts a meta-analytic review of the research adopting the perceived locus of causality in the contexts of sport, exercise, and physical education. A literature search of published articles identified three main research foci: (a) the development of instruments that assess perceived locus of causality; (b) examination of the construct validity of perceived locus of causality by investigating the relevance of the self-determination continuum as well as by using antecedents (e.g., perceived competence) and outcomes (e.g., intentions); and (c) integration of Nicholls’ (1984) concepts of task and ego orientation with perceived locus of causality. A meta-analysis using 21 published articles supported the existence of a self-determination continuum from external regulation to introjection and identification. In addition, path analysis of corrected effect sizes supported the mediating effects of perceived locus of causality on the relationship between perceived competence and intentions. Results are discussed with reference to the assumptions of self-determination theory, Vallerand’s (1997) hierarchical model of intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and theories of behavioral intentions. Understanding adherence to health-related behaviors is an important avenue for scientific inquiry. Knowledge of the fundamental processes and mechanisms of human behavior can inform practice about how to promote human motivation. Deci and Ryan’s (1985) self-determination theory has become increasingly popular in studies of human motivation (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999a).

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a273da5e221f68f568fcedb3f2e8e2547a6d95c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Martin S. Hagger
  2. Nikos Ntoumanis
  3. Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
  4. Robert J. Vallerand
  5. Richard M. Ryan
  6. Rafael A. Calvo
  7. Dorian Peters
  8. C. Lonsdale

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Martin S. Hagger
  2. Nikos Ntoumanis
  3. Richard M. Ryan
  4. Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
  5. Robert J. Vallerand
  6. D. Collins
  7. Richard Bailey *
  8. C. Lonsdale

In Social Psychology

  1. Martin S. Hagger
  2. Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
  3. Nikos Ntoumanis
  4. Robert J. Vallerand
  5. Richard M. Ryan
  6. C. Sabiston
  7. I. Taylor
  8. C. Lonsdale

Citations in the corpus