Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Silene latifolia
By L. Wolfe, J. Elzinga, A. Biere. 2004
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19882dd5c74f906880ed511e3a0cb53935120682
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- E. Siemann
- R. Callaway
- Jianwen Zou
- W. E. Rogers
- W. H. van der Putten
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
In Insect Science
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- P. Alpert
- Jianwen Zou
- E. Siemann
- W. E. Rogers
- David L. Strayer
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- D. Richardson
- Petr Pyšek
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- E. Siemann
- Jianwen Zou
- R. Callaway
- W. E. Rogers
- David L. Strayer
Citations in the corpus
- Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, unknown): “range) % flowering, trichomes Blair and Wolfe (2004) + 17/20 CG (native range) PF, HP, fungal infection Wolfe et al. (2004)”
- Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. (2009, result): “However, experimental tests of this hypothesis have shown a broad range of results, ranging from complete agreement (Garden D in Fig. 2B; e.g., Blossey and Nötzold, 1995; Siemann and Rogers, 2001; Wolfe et al., 2004), to equivocal results (Gardens B and C in Fig.”
- Natives adapting to invasive species: ecology, genes, and the sustainability of conservation (2007, background): “An apparent consequence has been the evolution of reduced enemy resistance and increased growth and reproduction over the past 200 years (Wolfe et al. 2004).”
- Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum (2008, background): “Thus, experiments in native and introduced ranges are necessary to compare the performance and herbivore susceptibility between native and invasive populations (Maron et al. 2004; Wolfe et al. 2004; Bossdorf et al. 2005; Hierro et al. 2005).”
- Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. (2007, background): “Plants of Silene latifolia introduced in North America are released from fruit predators and pathogens and flower earlier than are their native counterparts in Europe. The difference is genetically based [ 5 ].”
- Climate Change, Aboveground-Belowground Interactions, and Species' Range Shifts (2012, background): “Thisprocess has been tested for cross-continental introductions of exotic plant species, although these costs are difficult to quantify and experimental tests sometimes show opposite results (Wolfe et al. 2004). produce high defense levels.”
- Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “, 2004) or the opposite of what EICA predicts (Wolfe et al., 2004).”
- The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced (2006, background): “Introduced populations of Silene latifolia tend to flower earlier and longer than native ones (Wolfe et al. 2004), which might expose them to early or late frosts.”
- Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. (2006, background): “[19,20]). For example, specimens of the tallow tree Sapium sebifera from North America grow faster and produce lower concentrations of tannins than do those from their native Asia (Figure 3). Likewise, invasive species can evolve to use local species as food [21], avoid local enemies, or match their”
- Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum (2007, background): “…differences and a genetic change could be revealed by common garden experiments in which both native and invasive individuals are grown together in the same environment (Siemann & Rogers 2001; Leger & Rice 2003; Wolfe, Elzinga & Biere 2004; Erfmeier & Bruelheide 2005; Güsewell et al. 2006).”
- NO EVIDENCE FOR TRADE‐OFFS: CENTAUREA PLANTS FROM AMERICA ARE BETTER COMPETITORS AND DEFENDERS (2008, background): “…al. 1994), and some experiments have demonstrated one or both predictions of the EICA hypothesis (Siemann and Rogers 2001, 2003, Maron et al. 2004, Wolfe et al. 2004), whereas other studies of invasive plant species have not found evidence for changes in defense or growth (Vilá et al. 2003,…”