Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions.

By J. Elzinga, A. Atlan, A. Biere, L. Gigord, A. E. Weis, G. Bernasconi. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2007

705 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6a331463891f158aa25ac56bb53c6ab55e46c60

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Flowering phenology and height growth pattern are associated with maximum plant height, relative growth rate and stem tissue mass density in herbaceous grassland species (2011, background): “and biotically similar habitats remains incomplete (Elzinga et al. 2007).”
Pre‐dispersal acorn predation in mixed oak forests: interspecific differences are driven by the interplay among seed phenology, seed size and predator size (2009, background): “The advantage of producing seeds off-peak (earlier or later) to reduce seed predation has been mostly discussed in light of the probable lower presence of herbivores at this time (Elzinga et al. 2007).”
Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions (2018, background): “Additionally, environmental change can modulate biotic interactions via phenological mismatches, such as for plant–pollinator interactions (Berg et al., 2010; Elzinga et al., 2007).”
Genetic differentiation and regional adaptation among seed origins used for grassland restoration: lessons from a multispecies transplant experiment (2017, background): “This will likely influence the interactions of plants with their pollinators and seed herbivores (Elzinga et al. 2007).”
Response of individual components of reproductive phenology to growing season length in a monocarpic herb (2011, background): “The compressed reproductive schedule may also alter biotic interactions such as with pollinators or herbivores (Elzinga et al. 2007; Hegland et al. 2009) or other abiotic factors (Giménez-Benavides, Escudero& Iriondo 2007; Inouye 2008; Jentsch et al.”
Influence of extrafloral nectary phenology on ant–plant mutualistic networks in a neotropical savanna (2013, background): “plant–pollinator) also noted that the plant phenology is an important factor in the temporal variation of this association (Elzinga et al., 2007; Olesen et al., 2008; Rafferty & Ives, 2011).”
Advances in flowering phenology across the Northern Hemisphere are explained by functional traits (2018, background): “Seeds of early-flowering species have more time to mature than seeds of late-flowering species (Elzinga et al., 2007).”
How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? (2009, background): “Many plants appear to have reacted to increasing temperatures by earlier flowering during the last 20–50 years (Fitter & Fitter 2002; Fig.”
Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature (2017, background): “ure [see reviews on the fitness effects of timing of flowering (Elzinga et al. 2007), seed size (Leishman et al.”
Weed-insect pollinator networks as bio-indicators of ecological sustainability in agriculture. A review (2016, background): “In addition, insect pollinators tend to favor peak or early flowerings, while pre-dispersal seed predators tend to favor off-peak or later flowerings (Elzinga et al. 2007).”