Online Victimization of Youth : Five Years Later.

By J. Wolak, Kimberly J. Mitchell, David Finkelhor. 2006

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19060eced22acc2c2d921c0ddc9457f8482c6389

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Predicting Online Harassment Victimization Among a Juvenile Population (2012, methodology): “Respondents were asked whether or not (0 = no,1 = yes) their parents “have any sort of software that keeps you from looking at certain websites or content online?” This item provided a more accurate representation of a physical guardian than antivirus tools and other protective software because a bl”
CHILDREN AND ONLINE RISK (2009, background): “…in 2006 found one in three had been exposed to unwanted sexual content, one in three communicated online with people they had not met offline, one in seven had received an unwanted sexual solicitation, and 9 per cent had been distressed by exposure to unwanted sexual material (Wolak et al. 2006).”
Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries (2012, unknown): “8,18 Some researchers 19 have proposed that the criterion of imbalance of power differs in cyberbullying, since the victims can choose between more coping strategies than in conventional bullying.”
Risk Factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies, and bully-victims (2012, background): “…research and academic literature devoted to this new form of bullying (Berson et al., 2002; Hinduja & Patchin, 2009; Lenhart & Madden, 2007; Wolak et al., 2006; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004a, 2004b) including large surveys to determine normative data on the prevalence and character of cyber…”
The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior (2008, methodology): “In Study 2, where teens were asked directly about sexual solicitation, 15% reported having been approached, a rate that is in agreement with the 13% solicitation rate reported by Wolak et al. (2006) in their survey of online teens.”
A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns (2013, background): “Prevention Measures As part of their follow-up study, Wolak et al. (2006) stipulated that the fluidity of the online environment has a positive impact on internet safety education, as many of the risky behaviours utilised by young people online are not yet ingrained in their internet culture.”
Going Cyber: Using Routine Activities Theory to Predict Cyberbullying Experiences (2012, methodology): “As affirmed by others (Kowalski and Limber 2007; Wolak et al. 2006), adolescent females were at greater risk for experiencing cyberbullying versus adolescent males.”
The unintended consequences of digital technology: exploring the relationship between sexting and cybervictimization (2013, result): “This finding is somewhat surprising, particularly given the recent evidence to the contrary (see Wolak et al. 2006, Marcum et al. 2010).”
Real-World Dangers in an Online Reality: A Qualitative Study Examining Online Relationships and Cyber Abuse (2009, background): “Thirtyfour percent of youths reported being exposed to unwanted online sexual content in 2005, an increase from 25% in 2000 (Finkelhor et al., 2000; Wolak et al., 2006).”