Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: some methodological issues

By Giuseppe Munda. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes (2004, background): “Munda (1996) describes ‘weak comparability’ (strong conflictual consequences of actions) as the philosophical foundation of multicriteria analysis.”
Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies (2006, background): “According to this principle, the social cost of a given output is defined as the sum of money compensating all those who lose, as a result of production of the output in question so that they reattain their previous level of utility (Munda, 1996).”
Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “The methods of this family do not define the weights of criteria [89].”
Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising (2003, unknown): “E-mail addresses: rammel@pflaphy.pph.univie.ac.at (C. Rammel), jbergh@feweb.vu.nl (J.C.J.M. van den Bergh). normative policy theory (e.g. Vatn and Bromley, 1994; Victor, 1991; Gutés, 1996; Munda, 1996, 1997; van den Bergh et al., 2000; Gowdy, 2003).”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development (2005, unknown): “One should note that indeed cost-benefit analysis can be easily criticised both from the distributive and environmental points of view (see e.g., [60, 88]).”
Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics (1998, methodology): “To see ecosystems in terms of ‘reflexive complex systems’ implies the study of the human dimensions of ecological 3 In Munda (1996) it has been shown that cost-benefit analysis can be considered a particular case of multi-attribute utility theory.”
Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences (2004, background): “environmental points of view (see e.g., Munda, 1996; Spash and Hanley, 1995).”
Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey (2005, background): “See on this for example (Munda, 1996; O´Connor, 2002; Turner et al., 2003).”