Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies
By Giuseppe Munda. 2006
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24f3df8f89f3933ef4e6b60cdfd7dbb6368e6232
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- A. Gasparatos
- B. De Baets
- G. Van Huylenbroeck
- Kamran Zendehdel
- Aris Christodoulou
- Michaël Rademaker
- Koichiro Mori
Citations in the corpus
- Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) (2012, methodology): “If we synthesize and evaluate multidimensional nature of complexity, a multi-criteria framework is a very efficient tool to operationalise the Neurath's idea ‘orchestration of sciences’ (Munda, 2006).”
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “In addition, the NAIADE tool offers an explicit approach to conflict analysis between social actors (not only organized interest groups but societal actors more broadly) drawing on institutional analysis and sociological research methods.”
- The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism (2009, background): “Nevertheless, Nardo et al. (2005), have developed a generic framework for the development of composite sustainability indices including the designation of a theoretical framework, selection of the variables, multivariate analysis, imputation of the missing data, normalisation of data, weighting and ”
- A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany (2009, background): “This underlines the point that the determination of weights together with decision makers is a crucial part of a multicriteria approach ( Munda 2006, Proctor and Drechsler 2006).”
- Environmental decision making with conflicting social groups: A case study of the Lar rangeland in Iran (2010, background): “intensities of preferences to rank the alternative plans Outranking methodologies possess the ability to deal with uncertain, qualitative and quantitative preferences of DMs (Cook, 2006; Kangas et al., 2001; Munda, 2006; Proctor and Drechsler, 2003; Springael and De Keyser, 2004).”