Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey

By W. Born, Felix Rauschmayer, I. Bräuer. 2005

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1289a15d4d751a4e5298533dd915878f8eb95d18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach (2011, background): “Economic evaluations of biological invasions, for instance, tend to focus on direct or market impacts, while indirect and non-market impacts are often ignored or neglected because of difficulties in deriving appropriate estimates ( Born et al. 2005 ).”
The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain. Annexes 1 and 2 to the report. (2010, background): “The description of the studies of the economic impact of INNS often lack a clear methodology (Born et al. 2004), leading to speculation about the accuracy of the estimates.”
Benefits of Classical Biological Control for Managing Invasive Plants (2005, background): “The aim of such analyses is to assess all relevant impacts in monetary terms, thus reducing a complex of multidimensional factors to a one-dimensional scale (Born et al., 2004); complex ecological effects are transformed into more readily grasped economic effects.”
Economics of Harmful Invasive Species: A Review (2014, background): “Studies that are more focused in scope and/or scale, which calculate damage costs of only one species or group of species, were carried out first in the 1980s, and there exist today several reviews of such single species studies [3–5].”
Economic Impacts of Non-Native Forest Insects in the Continental United States (2011, background): “Our analysis indicates that the cost of non-native forest insects is largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments, large constituencies that may not be adequately considered in most analyses [10].”
The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species (2008, background): “Only in New Zealand are prevention activities of border control and quarantine assessed economically ex post and incorporated in a national prevention program (Born et al. 2005).”
Economics of invasive species policy and management (2017, background): “However, nonmarket values and ecosystem service impacts are receiving increasing attention and often are of even greater value (see reviews in Holmes et al. 2009, 2014; Born et al. 2005; Rosenberger et al. 2012).”
How much is Europe spending on invasive alien species? (2009, background): “Moreover the relationship with the actual level of threat to biodiversity, as caused by IAS, will remain difficult to establish (see Mace and Baillie 2007; Born et al. 2005) and ex post evaluations of the project results are not available, so it is not possible to investigate their actual contributi”
Impacts of introduced seaweeds (2007, background): “An economic assessment of the impacts of seaweed invasions should cover all potentially affected values including use and non-use values (Perrings et al. 2002, Born et al. 2004, also see Nunes and van den Berg 2001 for a review of economic valuation of biodiversity).”
Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. (2013, unknown): “Therefore, they do not encompass prevention, the preferred management strategy [75]; neither do they address the ongoing costs and beneﬁts of different possible policy decisions regarding invasions in general (Courtois P. Mulier C., and Salles, J-M. personal communication).”
Socio‐economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT) (2018, methodology): “Moreover, monetary estimates of socio-economic costs vary considerably depending on the accounting method used (Born et al. 2005).”