Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development

By Giuseppe Munda. 2005

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/441034c0c3dd08d9f8c7ca2c3db1ee26ee0379ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment (2014, methodology): “Performance aggregation based MCDA methods (i.e. MAUT and AHP) score badly on this indicator since they assume complete compensation among the criteria and as a consequence they can be used only to enforce a weak sustainability concept (Munda, 2005; Rowley et al., 2012).”
On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, methodology): “19 Another distinctive categorisation of the aggregation methods in the literature would be that of choosing between ‘compensatory’ and ‘non-compensatory’ approaches (Munda 2005b).”
Integrating Multiple Perspectives in Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Flood-Mitigation Alternatives: The Case of Malborghetto-Valbruna (2008, background): “The presence of different non-equivalent descriptions of reality and social incommensurability (Munda, 2004; 2005) results in different definitions of what are constraints to development and how decisions about constraints should be taken.”
Constructing Consistent Composite Indicators: the Issue of Weights (2005, background): “…innovation or academic performance (see Cox and others 1992, Cribari-Neto et al 1999, Färe et al. 1994, Griliches 1990, Forni et al. 2001, Huggins 2003, Grupp and Mogee 2004, Lovell et al. 1995, Munda 2005, Nardo et al. 2005, Saisana and Tarantola 2002, and Wilson and Jones 2002, among others).”
Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting (2009, background): “…or academic performance (see Cox et al., 1992; Cribari-Neto et al., 1999; Färe et al., 1994; Forni et al., 2001; Griliches, 1990; Grupp and Mogee, 2004; Huggins, 2003;Lovell et al., 1995;Munda, 2005;Nardo et al., 2005; Saisana and Tarantola, 2002 and Wilson and Jones, 2002, among others).”