CATA penalty/reward

By Dave Plaehn. 2012

78 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/180c9a5dcfcb6abaa5e4233745c9e1c6ba965ada

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. G. Ares
2. A. Giménez
3. Paula Varela

In Food Science

1. Paula Varela
2. G. Ares
3. A. Giménez
4. S. Jaeger
5. Leticia Vidal
6. S. Fiszman

In Nutrition and Dietetics

1. Paula Varela
2. G. Ares
3. A. Giménez

Citations in the corpus

• Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization (2012, unknown): “, 2011a, 2011b), and citrus-flavored sodas (Plaehn, 2012).”
• Penalty analysis based on CATA questions to identify drivers of liking and directions for product reformulation (2014, background): “o Penalty analysis • The percentage of consumers who used an attribute differently for describing each sample and the ideal product Threshold: 20% (Xiong & Meullenet, 2006; Plaehn, 2012).”
• Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science (2012, unknown): “In a very recent paper, Plaehn (2012) proposed to use a penalty ⁄ reward analysis akin to the one used for 'Just About Right scales' (Lawless & Heymann, 2010) to analyse CATA questions in association with hedonic ratings.”