The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence.

By W. J. Schneider, K. McGrew. 2012

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17e70f76ac3d11418e1f1ebc2ca0c9a5a38fb6c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test (2017, background): “…computational thinking is related to the following three abilities-factors from the CattellHorn-Carroll (CHC) model of intelligence (McGrew, 2009; Schneider & McGrew, 2012): Fluid reasoning (Gf), defined as: “the use of deliberate and controlled mental operations to solve novel problems that…”
On the nature of crystallized intelligence: the relationship between verbal ability and factual knowledge☆ (2014, background): “An intelligence framework that explicitly distinguishes between certain language skills and factual knowledge is the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory (e.g., McGrew, 2009; Schneider & McGrew, 2012), a synthesis and extension of the Three-stratum theory and the extended Gf-Gc theory.”
LibRA (2019, unknown): “We obtained the participants’ big-five personality traits, as assessed by the Big Five Inventory (BFI-2) scale [138, 142], and executive function, especially their fluid and crystallized intelligence, as assessed by the Shipley scale [23, 129, 133].”
John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models (2015, unknown): “, [63,64]).”
Test Review: Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (2015, unknown): “Notably, factor analyses were conducted to see how individual tests loaded on CHC broad factors (see Schneider & McGrew, 2012); factor analyses were not conducted to determine how individual tests loaded on WJ IV ACH clusters.”
Use of Response Time for Measuring Cognitive Ability (2016, background): “Probably the most comprehensive framework to date for characterizing the organization of human abilities is the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory [19–24].”
A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education (2018, unknown): “Some of these factors such as visualisation (Gv) are known to be more powerful in their representation of spatial ability (Carroll 1993; Schneider and McGrew 2012).”