Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control

By P. R. Montague, S. Hyman, J. Cohen. Nature, 2004

981 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16cd7a24d117f61da645fba1b4cc31839dff2805

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Spatial Cognition and the Brain (2008, background): “Thus, synaptic plasticity in the striatum may be controlled by levels of dopamine locally released (see Redgrave & Gurney 2006) as a function of prediction error (Waelti et al. 2001; Montague et al. 2004; O’Doherty et al. 2004).”
Intact-Brain Analyses Reveal Distinct Information Carried by SNc Dopamine Subcircuits (2015, positive): “…neurons suggested that a key function of DA is to transmit reward prediction error signals (Mirenowicz and Schultz, 1996; Schultz et al., 1997; Waelti et al., 2001), a hypothesis concordant with temporal difference learning models (Montague et al., 1996, 2004; Steinberg et al., 2013; Sutton, 1988).”
The Brain as a Hierarchical Organization (2008, neutral): “Last, part (iii) shows that not only the realized valuation matters for consumption and labor but also whether it is a good that the agent usually likes it a lot or not.”
What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals? (2008, background): “…of both the neuroscience (BarGad et al., 2003; Bayer and Glimcher, 2005; Morris et al., 2004; O'Doherty et al., 2003; Schultz, 1998; Ungless, 2004) and computational communities (Dayan and Balleine, 2002; Montague et al., 1996; Montague et al., 2004; Singh et al., 2005; Sutton and Barto, 1998).”
Recombinase-driver rat lines: tools, techniques, and optogenetic application to dopamine-mediated reinforcement (2011, positive): “…experimental control of neuronal populations that are likely to influence a wide variety of neural and behavioral functions (Changeux, 2010; Surmeier et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2008; Gerfen and Surmeier, 2011; Nader and LeDoux, 1999; Montague et al., 2004) in this important animal system.”
The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. (2006, background): “exploratory behaviour (Montague et al., 2004), so do not offer exclusive support for the SMH.”
A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. (2007, background): “At least with respect to appetitive rewards, this activation is similar to that found with nonhuman samples ( Montague et al., 2004 ).”
Striatal plasticity and basal ganglia circuit function (2008, background): “according to one prominent theory, can signal a ‘‘reward prediction error’’ (Montague et al., 2004; Schultz, 2007).”
An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. (2005, background): “Such models describe mechanisms that seek to exploit opportunities optimally for reward by sampling a wide range of behaviors and strengthening actions leading to states with the highest value (Montague et al. 2004, Sutton & Barto 1981).”
REVIEW: Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview (2006, background): “Indeed, some of the late conceptualizations about the possible role of the Medial Forebrain Bundle, identify dopamine release as a ‘learning/gating signal’ (Spanagel & Weiss 1999; Waelti, Dickinson & Schultz 2001; Montague, Hyman & Cohen 2004; Salamone et al .”
Eye movements in natural behavior. (2005, positive): “The most impressive evidence for this comes from experiments by Schultz that show that dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta – a part of the basal ganglia system - behave in ways predicted by mathematical models of reinforcement [17,45].”
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience (2007, methodology): “I should acknowledge that incentive salience is not the only form of incentive motivational value carried by a reward: there are other more cognitive and predominantly cortically mediated forms of motivational value, which use explicit representations of reward outcome value and representations of a”