Eye movements in natural behavior.

By Mary M. Hayhoe, Dana H. Ballard. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005

1,392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ec3c533e569ff3bd8b2935df7eafb661a1ea5de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception (2009, background): “…presumably originating in the ventral stream, has a robust influence on the deployment of gaze both when viewing a scene (Hoffman & Subramanian 1995; Rock & Mack 1998; Findlay & Gilchrist 2003) and when engaging in specific visuomotor tasks (Ballard et al. 1995; Hayhoe 2000; Hayhoe & Ballard 2005).”
Modeling Search for People in 900 Scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance (2009, positive): “…of oculomotor behaviour during ecological tasks (driving, e.g., Land & Lee, 1994; food preparation, e.g., Hayhoe, Shrivastava, Mruczek, & Pelz, 2003; sports, e.g., Land & McLeod, 2000) is the functional relation of gaze to one’s momentary information processing needs (Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005).”
Eye–hand coordination in a sequential target contact task (2009, background): “In such tasks, gaze is typically directed to successive contact locations as the action unfolds, arriving before the hand (or object in hand) and departing around the time the sub-goal is completed (Ballard et al. 1992; Epelboim et al. 1995; Hayhoe and Ballard 2005; Johansson et al. 2001; Land et ”
Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. (2012, background): “However, in naturalistic viewing, EMs are the primary means of attentional selection, with covert attention largely relegated to guiding EMs (Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003; Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005).”
Biometric Measures for Interactive Advertising Research (2011, background): “Moving attention depends on task requirements (Folk, Remington, and Johnston 1992; Hayhoe and Ballard 2005), though some elements have a higher likelihood of capturing attention, especially elements with greater biological meaning, such as movements (Hillstrom and Yantis 1994), distinctive or…”
Learning to Recognize Daily Actions Using Gaze (2012, background): “Yi and Ballard [28] use a wearable eye-tracking system and wearable sensors on the hands to detect the grasped and gazed object for recognizing daily actions.”
Eye tracking studies of normative and atypical development (2007, background): “of recent research on eye tracking during scene perception can be found in Henderson (2003), Hayhoe and Ballard (2005), Henderson and Hollingworth (1999), and Land and Furneaux (1997).”
Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction (2017, background): “Objects not related to the task at hand are rarely ﬁxated (Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005).”
Robust Recognition of Reading Activity in Transit Using Wearable Electrooculography (2009, background): “Important advances are being made to the understanding of how our brains process tasks, and of the role that our visual system plays in this [7].”
SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. (2008, methodology): “As with many models of visual saliency, SUN is likely to function best for short durations when the task is simple (it is unlikely to model well the eye movements during Hayhoe’s sandwich-making task (Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005), for instance).”
Attention, learning and the value of information (2012, background): “…Rather than searching for an ‘‘intrinsic’’ preference for information, studies of eye movements in natural behaviors have Perspective adopted a more pragmatic approach and attempt to estimate the material value that an eye movement may bring (Hayhoe and Ballard, 2005; Tatler et al., 2011).”
State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling (2013, background): “Gaze, a coordinated motion of the eyes and head, has often been used as a proxy for attention in natural behavior (see [99]).”
VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES (2007, background): “On this hypothesis, eye movements are primarily controlled by task goals interacting with a semantic interpretation of the scene and memory for similar viewing episodes ( Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005; Henderson & Ferreira, 2004a).”
Task and context determine where you look. (2016, background): “…up saliency (Itti & Koch, 2000; Oliva, Torralba, Castelhano, & Henderson, 2003; Parkhurst & Niebur, 2002), which is independent of the computational goal, or top-down cognitive control (Buswell, 1935; Hayhoe & Ballard, 2005; Land, 2004; Yarbus, 1967) in which the behavioral objective is stressed.”
What do eyes reveal about the mind?: Algorithmic inference of search targets from fixations (2015, neutral): “Please see [1] [33] [78] [74] [57] [48] [47] [39] [5] for reviews.”
Principles of sensorimotor learning (2011, background): “(for example, towards moving high-contrast objects) as well as in a top-down, task-dependent manne”
Recurrent Models of Visual Attention (2014, background): “in the form of saliency; [11]) play an important role, the locations on which humans fixate have also been shown to be strongly task specific (see [9] for a review and also e.”
Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. (2006, background): “The neurophysiology and anatomy of the eye movement and action systems has been outside the scope of this review, but it is probably true to say that whilst a great deal is known about the neural basis of individual eye movements and actions, there is no equivalent body of knowledge relation to eye ”
Recognition of visual memory recall processes using eye movement analysis (2011, background): “A growing number of researchers study eye movements in natural environments to better understand the role the visual system plays in the execution of everyday tasks [19].”