Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words

By R. Harald Baayen, Laurie Beth Feldman, Rob Schreuder. 2006

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16158d6adc6171f744855764b7ba15773951129d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency (2010, background): “According to Baayen et al. (2006) the quadratic effect of family size is due to a facilitatory effect for words with in the low range of family sizes and an inhibitory effect for words with large family sizes.”
The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies (2007, methodology): “Because the CRFP does not have lemma frequencies, we limited our analyses to word surface frequencies (as has been done in English as well; see Baayen et al., 2006; Balota, Cortese, Sergent-Marshall, Spieler, & Yap, 2004).3 The first experiment examined the effects of word frequency and age of…”
The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. (2011, methodology): “After fitting the initial model, we take out outliers (following the procedure in Baayen et al., 2006).”
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density (2010, background): “Increased processing load associated with the production of less frequent word forms (Jescheniak & Levelt, 1994; Baayen et al., 2006) may spill over from the matrix verb to the CC onset.”
Biases in Predicting the Human Language Model (2014, background): “), (3) log morphological family size (number of inflectional and derivational morphological family members), (4) number of synonyms, and (5) the first principal component of a host of orthographic and phonological features capturing neighborhood effects (type and token counts of orthographic and pho”
Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities (2007, unknown): “This allows us to compare the consequences of the different temporal dynamics of reading and listening, as well as the consequences of differences in the depth of semantic processing: The lexical decision task requires substantially deeper semantic processing than does word naming (Baayen et al., 20”
Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing (2014, methodology): “Since only 6 of the 25 identical cognates in Experiment 1 and 2 were monosyllabic, we selected as materials the monosyllabic, monomorphemic words from the English Lexicon Project (henceforth ELP; Balota et al., 1999, 2007), that were previously studied in detail in Baayen et al. (2006).”
What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do) (2014, methodology): “); eliminate one or more of the variables; make a composite variable (for example, by making ratios of different frequency measures, as was done in Baayen et al., 2006 and Wurm, 2007); or subject the variables to a principle components analysis (as was done, for example, in Baayen et al., 2006).”
Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. (2007, methodology): “The typical result from English is that nonwords produce a robust length effect, whereas real words produce a much smaller length effect (Weekes, 1997; cf. Balota et al., 2004; Baayen et al., 2006).”