Change in dispositional well-being and its relation to role quality: A 30-year longitudinal study.

By B. Roberts, C. Chapman. 2000

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15eece8a0809dedb350c85cb6805cff16a9220d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Personality Development Across the Life Course:The Argument for Change and Continuity (2001, background): “Increasingly, researchers are also making use of growth curve analyses to model mean level changes over time, and to examine interindividual differences in intraindividual change (e.g., Jones & Meredith, 1996; Roberts & Chapman, 2000).”
PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships (2011, unknown): “…1997) and (ii) social relations influence personality development (e.g. Branje, van Lieshout, & van Aken, 2004; Lehnart, Neyer, & Eccles, 2010; Neyer & Lehnart, 2007; Roberts & Bogg, 2004; Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Scollon & Diener, 2006; van Aken, Dennisen, Branje, Dubas, & Goossens, 2006).”
Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. (2006, methodology): “First, we reviewed the reference list from an earlier meta-analysis of rank-order consistency for longitudinal studies (Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000).”
The Contributions of Personality to Organizational Behavior and Psychology: Findings, Criticisms, and Future Research Directions (2008, methodology): “Although, thanks to the work of Roberts et al. (e.g., Helson, Roberts, & Agronick, 1995; Roberts, 1997; Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Roberts, Caspi, & Moffitt, 2003), as well as others (e.g., Clausen & Gilens, 1990; Scollon & Diener, 2006), we have learned a great deal about personality change, much r”
Should i stay or should i go? Attachment and personality in stable and instable romantic relationships (2006, background): “Furthermore, marital tension and lower marital satisfaction have been shown to be related to increasing neuroticism from age 21 to 52 ( Roberts & Chapman, 2000 ).”
A Socioanalytic Model of Maturity (2004, background): “in turn, success in these areas may promote greater maturity (e.g., Roberts, 1997; Roberts & Chapman, 2000 ).”
Personality Trait Development in Adulthood (2012, background): “In addition, people who have satisfying jobs and marriages tend to increase in emotional stability ( Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Robins, Caspi, & Moffitt, in press).”
Distinguishing Features of Emerging Adulthood (2005, result): “This finding is consistent with prior research in that depression typically decreases by the end of adolescence; however, over the course of emerging adulthood, it rises slightly (Helson & Kwan, 2000; Roberts, Caspi, & Moffitt, 2001; Roberts & Chapman, 2000).”
Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. (2003, background): “More recently, Roberts and Chapman (2000) showed that work satisfaction was associated with increases in measures of emotional stability.”
Longitudinal Experience–Wide Association Studies—A Framework for Studying Personality Change (2020, unknown): “…stability and conscientiousness promote greater relationship satisfaction (Deventer, Wagner, Lüdtke, & Trautwein, 2019; Neyer & Lehnart, 2007; Roberts & Bogg, 2004; Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Robins, Caspi, & Moffitt, 2002; Scollon & Diener, 2006; Wagner, Lüdtke, Roberts, & Trautwein, 2014).”
The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits (2008, unknown): “For example, Roberts et al. (2005a) show that lower-level facets of Conscientiousness (for example, the traits of industriousness, self-control) have differential relationships with labor market and other outcomes, and, further, that these traits considered individually may predict outcomes better t”
Developmental Tasks as a Framework to Study Personality Development in Adulthood and Old Age (2014, methodology): “The meta-analysis by Roberts and DelVecchio (2000) suggests that rank-order stability remains stable from ages 30 to 50 years, at a value of about 0.”
Personality Development and Organizational Behavior (2006, methodology): “been studied over long periods of time (Roberts, 1997; Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Roberts,”
De‐investment in work and non‐normative personality trait change in young adulthood (2006, background): “Women who did not experience divorce became more dominant in the transition to midlife (Roberts et al., 2002), whereas people experiencing satisfying and fulfilling relationships became more emotionally stable and conscientious (Roberts & Bogg, 2004; Roberts & Chapman, 2000; Robins, Caspi, & Moffi”