Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach.

By Zorana Ivcevic. 2007

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15c4391400228e4200de45911bcc9b984098a29f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity (2015, background): “(Ivcevic, 2007, p. 272) The correlations that have been reported in the many studies that have made exactly this comparison have tended to hover around zero (especially if variance attributable to intelligence is removed; see Baer, 2010, 2012, in press; for summaries).”
Mapping Dimensions of Creativity in the Life-Space (2009, methodology): “Similarly, Ivcevic (2007) used an act-frequency approach and showed that lay people are able to identify specific acts performed by everyday and artistically creative individuals, and that they are able to reliably judge how prototypical different acts are of respective domains of creativity.”
Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) (2012, background): “Or is creativity domain-specific, with performance in different creative tasks poorly correlated with each other (Ivcevic, 2007)?”
Domain Specificity and the Limits of Creativity Theory (2012, background): “The “high intercorrelations among different creative behaviors” (Ivcevic, 2007; p. 272) that would demonstrate domain generality have not been observed.”
The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity (2017, background): “This domain-specific perspective has been validated by correlational research (Conti, Coon, & Amabile, 1996; Ivcevic, 2007; Sternberg, 1996) and experimental studies (Baer, 1994a, 1996).”
Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes (2014, background): “Creative activitymay provide an experience of discovery and growth, which includes the discovery of new cognitive pathways (Amabile, 1983; Csikszentmihalyi, 1997; Ivcevic, 2007; Sarnoff & Cole, 1988) and intrinsic motivation (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997).”