Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap

By Michal J Carrington, Benjamin A. Neville, G. Whitwell. 2014

726 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/159dc5eff3709659955e78498d4ff9ed8c6896b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Investigating environmental sustainability in small family-owned businesses: Integration of religiosity, ethical judgment, and theory of planned behavior (2021, background): “Carrington et al. (2014) and Moser (2016) conducted studies in Australia and Germany, respectively, to analyze an individual’s ethical motives and attitude toward green products.”
When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour (2020, background): “…known as the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap , was already subjected to extensive research (Auger & Devinney, 2007; Carrington, Neville, & Whitwell, 2010; Carrington, Neville, & Whitwell, 2014; Young, Hwang, McDonald, & Oates, 2010) yet remains as a challenge to motivate sustainable consumption to the…”
Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior:Scale Review, Development, and Validation (2016, neutral): “Consequently, despite the fact that ethical consumers are no longer classified as fringe (Carrington et al., 2014), and ethical products and services now account for increasing shares of many different markets (Ethical Consumer Markets Report, 2012), it is still relatively unusual to find reliable a”
Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap (2020, background): “This attitude–behavior gap model suggests that some individual factors such as demographics, lifestyle, or other factors [9,25] (Carrington et al., 2014, Hassan et al., 2014) contribute to attitude–behavior discrepancies.”