Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study

By Peter Nijkamp, G. Vindigni, P. A. Nunes. 2008

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/159a3038c4057769b3bf15a24720c891f1c3b7e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The value of green walls to urban biodiversity (2017, background): “The use of monetary indicators enables the direct comparison of alternative green policies as well as the costs based on a common unit of comparison, which is not always possible when using biological or descriptive indices (Natural England, 2013; Nijkamp et al., 2008; Nunes and Van den Bergh, 2001)”
An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “, 2003); revenues from tourists to areas of high biodiversity; and the value of bio-prospecting contracts (Nijkamp et al., 2006; Nunes and van den Bergh, 2001).”
A Global Map of Coastal Recreation Values: Results from a Spatially Explicit Meta-Analysis (2011, unknown): “…makes use of results from earlier empirical studies and applies their conclusions – according to a well-codified set of rules – to a policy site that differs from that of the study for which the values were originally estimated (Boyle & Bergstrom 1992; Florax et al. 2002; Nijkamp et al. 2008).”
Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting (2010, background): “Nijkamp, Vindigni, and Nunes (2008) show that a variety of different economic valuation methods are possible for biodiversity, each having their pros and cons and producing different valuations: travel costs, random utility, hedonic pricing, avertive expenditure, contingent valuation of choice…”
How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? (2008, unknown): “These goods include endangered species (Loomis and White 1996) and biodiversity (Nijkamp et al. 2006), wetlands (Brouwer et al.”
Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods (2014, methodology): “It is the most suitable technique for synthesis, whenever study findings contain a clear component of linguistic in terms of imprecise measurement (Nijkamp et al., 2008).”
Global Cost of Land Degradation (2016, methodology): “There is a considerable debate on the usefulness of the TEV approach (e.g. see a review by Nijkamp et al. 2008; Seppelt et al. 2011).”
How to value biodiversity in environmental management (2015, methodology): “Without direct market prices for environmental goods such as iodiversity, their value can be inferred using consumer prefernces (Nijkamp et al., 2008; Remoundou et al., 2009).”