Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life
By Andrew M. Colman. 2006
445 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15799e44e8e4f78e2f08e41380ed34f61b851a08
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Sebastian Fehrler
- Celia Moore
- Wojtek Przepiorka
- Michael E. Cox
- Francesca Gino
- Dan Sperber
- Elinor Ostrom
- Ananish Chaudhuri
Citations in the corpus
- Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, unknown): “However, considerable evidence demonstrates that people do not always act in the service of their instrumentality and resource concerns (see Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2005; Haslam & Ellemers, 2005; Kohn, 1999; Miller & Ratner, 1998; Pearce, 1987).”
- Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective (2012, background): “1 This ‘mutualistic’ approach has been challenged by scholars who view morality as having primarily evolved through group rather than individual selection and for the benefit of the group rather than of individuals (e.g. Sober and Wilson, 1998; Gintis et al., 2005).”
- Envy and positional bias in the evolutionary psychology of management (2006, unknown): “…and behavior are all tasks critical to the development of ecologically valid economic models, evolutionary psychology has the potential to provide important insights into phenomena that affect research within these disciplines (Browne, 2002; Colarelli, 2003; Gintis et al., 2005; Saad, 2005).”
- Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans (2011, background): “…theory (e.g., Boyd & Richerson, 2005; Boyd et al., 2003; de Waal, 2008; Fehr & Gächter, 2002; Fehr & Rockenbach, 2003; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Fehr & Rockenbach, 2004; Gintis et al., 2005b; Henrich & Boyd, 2001; Richerson & Boyd, 1999; Schloss, 2002; Silk, 2002) This is wrong on two counts.”
- Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups (2013, background): “…of social identity (Berreby, 2008) and cooperation games in behavioral economics demonstrating the importance of monitoring and sanctions (Gintis et al., 2005). p i i l m g t l b a s m a b l t e A b p R A B B B B B B B B C C D E F F F F F G G G G G G H H H H H J K Given such a strong…”
- Charitable Giving as a Signal of Trustworthiness: Disentangling the Signaling Benefits of Altruistic Acts (2013, background): “The question of how such cooperative behavior can be explained has attracted considerable attention across several decades and disciplines (see West, El Mouden, & Gardner, 2011 for a critical review).”
- Approach, Ability, Aftermath: A Psychological Process Framework of Unethical Behavior at Work (2015, background): “As the behavioral economists Herbert Gintis, Ernest Fehr, and colleagues write, “While the twentieth century was an era of increased specialization, the twenty-first may well turn out to be an era of trans-disciplinary synthesis” (Gintis et al., 2005, p. 4).”