A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.
By J. G. Snodgrass, M. Vanderwart. 1980
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- James L. McClelland
- M. L. Lambon Ralph
- Timothy T. Rogers
- Ellen Bialystok
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Micah M. Murray
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “In fact, most studies of semantic congruency have presented line drawings or pictures of objects (the former often taken from the classic database of Snodgrass and Vanderwart, 1980) together with a sound that is typically produced by a given object – e.g., the meowing of a cat to go with the static…”
- Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency (2006, methodology): “For the picture naming task 72 pictures were selected from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) norms, which consist of black line drawings on a white background.”
- A cognitive neuropsychological approach to assessment and intervention in aphasia: A clinician's guide (2005, background): “Materials 48 Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) black and white line drawings divided into three groups: 1 Treatment group (34 pictures).”
- A jigsaw-puzzle imagery task for assessing active visuospatial processes in old and young people (2002, methodology): “The stimuli were all pictures of inanimate objects chosen from the standardized material constructed by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980).”
- Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming (2000, methodology): “With help from sources such as Corbell (1986) and Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), we selected 112 depictable words for Experiment 1. All referenced common objects and had moderately high frequency of usage in Francis, Kucera, and Mackie (1982). The 56 items shown in Appendix A served as experimenta”
- Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning (2012, methodology): “The line drawings were taken from a standardized set (Snodgrass and Vanderwart, 1980) or obtained from an online library (dgl.”
- Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? (2004, background): “Priming Procedures R. Reber, Winkielman, and Schwarz (1998, Study 1) presented participants with pictures of everyday objects, such as a desk, bird, or plane (taken from Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980).”
- The role of compound awareness in Chinese children’s vocabulary acquisition and character reading (2009, background): “A total of 120 pictures were selected from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) .”
- The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues (2016, background): “Given that word frequency is known to correlate with conceptual processes (e.g. Laganaro, 2014; Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980), based on the ERP effect of that variable alone it is unclear whether the observed time-course of 180 ms reflects the onset of lexical access or rather earlier correlated…”
- Negative Priming as a Memory Phenomenon (2007, background): “Strayer and Grison (1999) additionally argued that the episodic retrieval model can only predict increased negative priming with stimulus repetition when the repetitions take place in the role of the (task-inappropriate) distractor stimulus, but not the (taskappropriate) target stimulus.”
- Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication (2000, methodology): “Black and white line drawings standardized by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) were utilized as stimuli.”
- Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages (2002, methodology): “Procedure . The stimuli were presented as black and white line drawings from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) and Morrison et al. (1997).”