The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations
By John T. Jost, B. Major. 2001
475 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/133a9f85e694439b074c228aa92413977e890a63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Verkuyten
- N. Ellemers
- John T. Jost
- Martijn van Zomeren
- Tom Postmes
- Russell Spears
- Manuela Barreto
- Tom Tyler
Citations in the corpus
- Connecting Work—Family Policies to Supportive Work Environments (2009, background): “Increased commitment, attachment, and identification with the organization have also been suggested as positive outcomes associated with individuals’ perceptions of legitimacy (Elsbach, 2001).”
- Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (2006, background): “In addition, perceivers might hold onto a lay theory that does not serve their ingroup interests because the lay theory is prevalent in their culture and, hence, difficult to reject (e.g. see Jost & Major, 2001).”
- Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. (2003, background): “Lane (1959) theorized that holding complementary, offsetting stereotypic beliefs helped people (especially the poor) to tolerate and justify economic inequality.”
- Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective (2006, background): “Increasingly, more attention is given to processes of legitimisation in social relations such as the role of ideologies (see Jost & Major, 2001) and lay theories (Levy, Chin, & Hong, 2006).”