Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability Across: Studies a Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study

By Robert M. Capraro, Mary Margaret Capraro. 2002

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12a79e12d32e49eb26d2973df42e1604db84ee9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In General Health Professions

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores (2005, result): “The descriptive analyses that were conducted were consistent with those that have been done in other studies (e.g., Capraro & Capraro, 2002; Reese, Kieffer, & Briggs, 2002).”
Why Don't Measures of Broad Dimensions of Personality Perform Better As Predictors of Job Performance? (2005, methodology): “The MBTI is reasonably reliable (Capraro & Capraro, 2002), but there is little reason to believe that this test is useful in organizational settings.”
Teacher's Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits (2007, methodology): “Addressing the reliability and validity of the MBTI, Capraro and Capraro (2002) completed a meta-analytic reliability generalization study that examined the variability of measurement error in multiple administrations.”
Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability (2002, background): “Capraro and Capraro (2002): Myers-Briggs Type Indicator 11.0 7.0 26.0 56.0 M. M. Capraro, Capraro, and Henson (2001): Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale — 25.0 — — Caruso (2000): NEO personality scales 12.3 15.2 19.3 44.3 Caruso and Edwards (2001): Eysenck Personality Questionnaire 20.3 6.2 11.0 62.5 ”
Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review (2004, methodology): “A meta-analysis of reliability across 210 recent studies (Capraro and Capraro 2002) notes that most authors of studies using the MBTI do not engage with issues of reliability at all; however, when reliability data was available, ‘the MBTI tended to yield acceptable score reliabilities’ (2002, 596) o”
Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. (2005, result): “More recent reports (Capraro & Capraro, 2002; Salter, Evans, & Forney, 1997) confirm previous reviews of the test-retest reliabilities of the MBTI scores.”