Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organizations

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence (2010, background): “A collective level of self-identity is defined in terms of broader group membership (van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2003a , 2003b ; van Knippenberg, van Knippenberg, De Cremer, & Hogg, 2004 ).”
The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, methodology): “A fuller analysis was published two years later (Hogg & van Knippenberg, 2003) as was a variant configured for and focused on leadership in organisational and management contexts (van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2003a).”
Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead (2015, background): “…we contribute to general leadership research by presenting and testing a conceptual framework that explicates how socio-cognitive processes central to the self-concept relate to leadership (see calls for research by Buunk & Gibbons, 2007; Greenberg et al., 2007; van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2003).”
Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. (2005, background): “In addition, group members may actively display or manipulate their own prototypicality, for instance, by actively seeking comparison with other outgroups or by simply stating that they represent the groups identity (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001, 2003).”