Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking

By Ja-Chul Gu, Sang-Chul Lee, Yung-Ho Suh. Expert systems with applications, 2009

865 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1290b8fe2fef53d2d4c7cfd2d6d7fe20db102cff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age (2014, neutral): “IU Hong and Tam (2006), Gu, Lee, and Suh (2009), Chandra et al. (2010), Kim, Mirusmonov, and Lee (2010), Huang et al. (2011), Gwebu and Wang (2011), Chong, Chan, et al. (2012), Chong, Ooi, et al. (2012) AT ?”
Trust disposition, trust antecedents, trust, and behavioral intention (2015, background): “Consistent with the results of Gu et al. (2009) and Luo et al. (2010), structural assurance shows the most influence on trust among the four trust antecedents.”
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce (2020, neutral): “System quality 15 Akroush et al., 2011; Gao & Waechter, 2017; Gao et al., 2015; Gu et al., 2009; Hajiheydari & Ashkani, 2018; Lee, Shin, & Lee, 2009; Silic & Ruf, 2018; Zhou, 2014, 2011b, 2012b, 2013a; Zhou, Li, & Liu, 2010 Information quality 18 Gao & Waechter, 2017; Gao et al., 2015; Hajiheydari…”
Mobile Banking Adoption: An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior (2013, background): “Empirical research also suggests that subjective norm positively affect e-payment as well as internet banking adoption (Gu et al., 2009; Kleijnen et al., 2004; Lin, et al., 2009; Chan and Lu, 2004; Puschel et al., 2010).”
Mobile Banking Adoption: Application of Diffusion of Innovation Theory (2012, background): “A vast body of research suggests that there is a strong impact of perceived ease of use of new technology on its adoption [Gu et al. 2009; Luarn & Lin 2005; Venkatesh & Davis 2000; Wang et al. 2006].”
An empirical study on trust in mobile banking: A developing country perspective (2016, background): “f Accountancy & MIS, DePaul their customers, but despite the widespread adoption of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets, the adoption rate of MB is still low (Akturan & Tezcan, 2012; Febraban, 2015; Gu et al., 2009; Lee & Chung, 2009; Zhou, 2012a; Zhou et al., 2010).”
Predicting the intention to use mobile banking in India (2018, background): “Trust thus plays a significant role in the adoption of mobile banking, helping customers overcome the fears of security/privacy risks and fraudulent activities in the mobile environment (Gu et al., 2009; Zhou, 2011; Afshan & Sharif, 2016).”
Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust (2017, background): “Moreover, by increasing the number of mobile subscribers worldwide, the potential market of Mobile banking services is more likely to expand and attract more customers, thus serving the aspirations of both customers and banks in this respect as well (Alalwan et al., 2016c; Gu et al., 2009; Lee et al”
Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy (2016, methodology): “, 2009; Zhou, 2011) and self-efficacy (Gu et al., 2009; Luarn and Lin, 2005).”