Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations: A Review

By Michael Zanko, Patrick Mark Bryant Dawson. 2012

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development, empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high‐reliability studies. The conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of process‐oriented contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11e0c2fa8e46e69a0b168b236e4b1898882d6c11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Statistics and Probability

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Biology and Management: A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda (2018, background): “This line of research would also have the potential to answer various enquiries in the occupational health and safety literature, such as “the links between occupational health and safety and human resource strategies” (Zanko & Dawson, 2012: 340).”
A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions (2018, background): “It identifies sources of risk and determines control measures before an injury happened (Zanko and Dawson 2012).”