Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis
By V. Spek, Pim Cuijpers, I. Nyklíček, Heleen Riper, J. Keyzer, V. Pop. Psychological Medicine, 2006
1,464 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10c882ab717c8510a6f0335b51697b02e6a6b27d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Gerhard Andersson
- Heleen Riper
- Per Carlbring
- Erik Hedman
- Pim Cuijpers
- Ho Ming Lau
- Jeroen Ruwaard
- Simon Provoost
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Gerhard Andersson
- Per Carlbring
- Thomas Richardson
- Heleen Riper
- Pim Cuijpers
- N. Sampson
- Erik Hedman
- Alan M. Zaslavsky
In Social Psychology
- N. Sampson
- Alan M. Zaslavsky
- Thomas Richardson
- Matthew K. Nock
- Gerhard Andersson
- Jordi Alonso
- J. Green
- R. Bruffaerts
Citations in the corpus
- Guided Internet-Based CBT for Common Mental Disorders (2013, background): “For example, Spek et al. (2007) found that iCBT without support had a pooled mean effect size of d = 0.24 whereas iCBT with support had a large pooled mean effect size of d = 1.00, and later reviews with a more specific focus (e.g., depression) have found similar effects (Johansson and Andersson…”
- Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions (2012, background): “Research has shown these interventions to be effective in different areas of health care [2-7].”
- Embodied Conversational Agents in Clinical Psychology: A Scoping Review (2017, positive): “Guided interventions are typically more clinically effective than unguided ones [2-4].”
- A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions (2009, methodology): “There is research indicating that external support of the application may improve adherence and outcomes for many disorders [33, 47, 50]; however, this is not always found to be the case [48, 49], and research is needed in order to determine what types of support are effective for which treatments.”
- Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial (2017, background): “Internet interventions for anxiety and depression have empirical support [6] with outcomes comparable to therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [7,8].”
- Online CBT in the Treatment of Child and Adolescent Anxiety Disorders: Issues in the Development of BRAVE–ONLINE and Two Case Illustrations (2008, background): “…therapy for anxious adults produces significant reductions in anxiety, these effects are relatively small and are more substantial if computer delivery of treatment is accompanied by regular contact with a therapist either by phone, email, or face-to-face (for a review see Spek et al., 2007).”
- Effectiveness of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Regular Clinical Settings (2013, background): “…from Efficacy Studies The empirical support for guided ICBT has been covered in many previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses [Andrews et al., 2010; Hedman et al., 2012a], not only for mood and anxiety disorders [Spek et al., 2007], but also for somatic problems [Cuijpers et al., 2008].”
- Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2010, background): “This appears important since the absence of therapist contact during cCBT has been associated with poorer outcomes (Gellatly et al. 2007; Spek et al. 2007).”
- Advantages and limitations of Internet‐based interventions for common mental disorders (2014, background): “Reviews of the literature consistently show that treatments that include guidance lead to better outcomes than unguided treatments (26-28), but there are occasional exceptions, and unguided treatments are emerging that can work by means of automated reminders and similar solutions (29,30).”
- The WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and Distribution of Mental Disorders (2018, positive): “…so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. Smits, 2008); particularly guided Internet-based CBT interventions (e.g., Baumeister, Reichler, Munzinger, & Lin, 2014; Palmqvist, Carlbring, & Andersson, 2007; V. Spek et al., 2007).”
- Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews (2010, methodology): “[24] Mental health (depression and anxiety) Global CBT via internet Health Twelve studies included (RCTs).”
- Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, background): “The effects of support versus no support are not new (Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009; Spek, Cuijpers, et al., 2007), however, the analysis showed clearly that support of some administrative type, not delivered by a mental health professional and not having the aim of being therapeutic, works equally…”
- Recommendations for policy and practice of telepsychotherapy and e-mental health in Europe and beyond. (2020, background): “Accumulating evidence indicates that e-mental health interventions that include guidance result in better outcomes than unguided treatments (Richards & Richardson, 2012; Spek et al., 2007; Palmqvist et al., 2007; Baumeister et al., 2014).”
- Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies (2010, background): “…then, dozens of randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown that guided self-help is effective in reducing depression, panic disorder, phobias and other anxiety disorders (Cuijpers, 1997 ; Gregory et al. 2004 ; Hirai & Clum, 2006; Gellatly et al. 2007 ; Menchola et al. 2007 ; Spek et al. 2007).”
- A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008, background): “…our results with those of previous meta-analyses of Internet interventions—though these are more limited in scope and content (Hirai & Clum, 2006b; Spek et al., 2007; Wantland et al., 2004) but employ alternative statistical models and assumptions—we find that the general nature of our findings…”