Advantages and limitations of Internet‐based interventions for common mental disorders

By Gerhard Andersson, N. Titov. World Psychiatry, 2014

1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13c09d6704c6aeae201cf5a4ad8640cec78fa52d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. C. Fairburn
2. Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
3. B. Meyer
4. Vikram Patel

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Fairburn
2. Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
3. Vikram Patel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wolfgang Lutz
2. Vikram Patel

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination (2017, background): “There are well established digital treatments for depression and most of the anxiety disorders, and for problems such as insomnia (Andersson & Titov, 2014).”
• Attitudes Towards Internet Interventions Among Psychotherapists and Individuals with Mild to Moderate Depression Symptoms (2017, background): “Such interventions could potentially be disseminated to vast numbers of people (Andersson and Titov 2014; Johansson and Andersson 2012) by circumventing some of the barriers inherent in traditional treatment, such as fear of stigmatization (Mohr et al.”
• The WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and Distribution of Mental Disorders (2018, neutral): “…that college campuses will have sufficient resources to support student needs for mental health services, exacerbating the problems that already exist in the mental health treatment system of escalating financial expenses and long waitlists (Andersson & Titov, 2014; Webb, Rosso, & Rauch, 2017).”
• The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions — A systematic review (2014, background): “Content of guidance and guidance protocol adherence are other factors which might substantially impact the efficacy of IBIs (Andersson and Titov, 2014; Paxling et al., 2013).”
• Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. (2016, background): “…traveling time and enabling people towork at their own pace; (3) permit users to remain anonymous without needing to adopt a patient role; (4) do not necessarily require involvement of a therapist educated in mindfulness; and (5) are less costly (Andersson & Titov, 2014; Cuijpers et al., 2009).”