Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
By Thomas Richardson, P. Stallard, Sophie C. Velleman. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2010
296 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f3559392b0d74b3819f281e29ec267dedaa11e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Clinical Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (2012, background): “16 A recent systematic review 13 identified six studies of four computerised cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for depression in children and adolescents.”
- Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014, background): “CBT has demonstrated efficacy in both group and individual formats [1189,1190,1194,1217,1218], as well as in computer- or internet-based formats [1219,1220].”
- Rainbow SPARX: A Novel Approach to Addressing Depression in Sexual Minority Youth (2015, methodology): “There are numerous advantages or strengths associated with CCBT: it is acceptable and effective (Calear & Christensen, 2010; Richardson et al., 2010); requires less (if any) therapist time (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005); can be accessed at a time and place that suits t”
- Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta‐review (2017, background): “Nine reviews explicitly stated that they included grey and unpublished literature in their review (Ali et al., 2015; Calear & Christensen, 2010; Clarke et al., 2015; Farrer et al., 2013; Newton & Ciliska, 2006; Podina et al., 2016; Richardson et al., 2010; Rickwood & Bradford, 2012; Ye et al., 2014)”