Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews
By A. Ekeland, A. Bowes, S. Flottorp. Int. J. Medical Informatics, 2010
1,129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02f0a48d971b6e416d69ed967685f164b52ebb6f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Internet of Medical Things: A Review of Recent Contributions Dealing With Cyber-Physical Systems in Medicine (2018, neutral): “neous, and are also generally designed to answer a single therapeutic goal, such as remote cardiac monitoring, stroke rehabilitation [4], etc.”
- A MODEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE APPLICATIONS: MAST (2012, methodology): “The MAST model was developed through user and stakeholder workshops and on the basis of a systematic literature review (10) as described above.”
- Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies - A literature review (2011, background): “he scope of this literature review is broader than those preiously carried out in the field [13,16,46–50,112], given that t includes searches in management databases.”
- Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) (2016, background): “The system is useful when it works and has positive effects on clinical outcomes or reduces clinical cost (Ekeland, Bowes, & Flottorp, 2010).”
- Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery (2012, background): “In a recent systematic review of reviews [17], 21 out of 80 heterogeneous reviews concluded that telemedicine was effective.”