Moral Intensity, Issue Importance, and Ethical Reasoning in Operations Situations

By S. Valentine, David Hollingworth. 2012

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Demography, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10c1b9c813af55c1fa663eb8a0d9a3507554f85a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
2. A. Musbah
3. Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
4. David A. Tyfa
5. Hengky Latan
6. Christian M. Ringle
7. C. Cowton

In Demography

1. A. Musbah
2. David A. Tyfa
3. C. Cowton

In Information Systems and Management

1. Hengky Latan
2. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
3. Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
4. A. Musbah
5. David A. Tyfa
6. Christian M. Ringle
7. C. Cowton
8. Marko Sarstedt

Citations in the corpus

• The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, methodology): “These results are supported by recent research (e.g. Valentine and Bateman 2011; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012).”
• Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects (2016, background): “…a significant relationship between moral intensity and the intention to behave ethically (Singer 1996; Coram et al. 2008; McMahon and Harvey 2007; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012) and the intention of whistleblowing (Clements and Shawver 2011; Curtis and Taylor 2009; Taylor and Curtis 2010;…”
• Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis (2017, background): “Previous research has found a significant relationship between moral intensity and ethical judgments (Singer et al. 1998; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012; Yu 2015; McMahon and Harvey 2007; Leitsch 2004).”