Assessment of Bullying: A Review of Methods and Instruments

By Laura M. Crothers, E. Levinson. 2004

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence (2014, background): “Due to the high social desirability of prosocial behavior (Crothers & Levinson, 2004), one strength of our study was the use of peer-rating measures, with at least 20 classmates evaluating each others’ behavior.”
Predictors of Bullying and Victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-analytic Investigation (2010, unknown): “How bullying is measured may also influence study results (Crothers & Levinson, 2004; Espelage & Swearer, 2003).”
What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “…although the requirement that bullying must be repeated frequently has long been incorporated into both theoretical definitions and assessment measures (Berger, 2007; Crothers & Levinson, 2004), recent advances in research raise the question of whether it is a necessary feature of bullying.”
Bullying and Victimization, Depressive Mood, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescents: The Moderating Role of Parental Support (2015, background): “(Crothers and Levinson 2004), for example, advise to assess bullying by multiple informants and by means of multiple assessment methods in different contexts over a longer period of time.”