The Uses of Argument, Updated Edition

By S. Toulmin. 2008

541 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10b9b37bc77d20c4dac5031ef1fc2425e9c29b1d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities (2014, background): “To continue to address the call by Yackel (2002), the framework allows researchers to generate cases of teacher support for collective argumentation.”
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse (2016, methodology): “11 We ignored social media sites and micro-blogs, either because searching and harvesting data is technically challenging (Facebook, Google Plus), or the texts are too short to convey argumentation, as seen in our preliminary experiments (the case of Twitter).”
How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge (2009, methodology): “To accomplish this goal, I identified the elements of Toulmin’s (2003) model, the form of premises in Fenstermacher and Richardson’s (1993) work; and also any new categories in terms of elements and forms of practical arguments, and thus built up a basic categorization and conceptual framework for f”
Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. (2012, methodology): “Some groups have drawn from the work of Toulmin (2006) and others to define explanations and to design and study middle and high school students’ explanation building in science (e.g., Linn, Shear, Bell, & Slotta, 1999; McNeill & Krajcik, 2007; Sandoval, 2003; Songer, Kelcey, & Gotwals, 2009).”