Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves (2017, background): “The impact of a text thus results from two main rhetorical strategies which Hyland (2012) refers to as proximity, or how writers situate themselves in relation to the readers by their use of the familiar discursive conventions of the discipline, and positioning, or the stance they adopt to the…”
The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, unknown): “Further reading Benesch (2001); Pennycook (1999, 2010)”
‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing (2015, background): “…is also an expression of an author’s proximity to his or her discipline, so that writers’ choices are not arbitrary, but reflect their assessment of readers’ needs and expectations as they construct arguments and negotiate potential objections which address a disciplinary community (Hyland, 2012).”
“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018, background): “The training and acculturation involved in becoming a professional scholar largely involves acquiring knowledge in a specialised field, so that the disciplines are not just sources of knowledge but the foundations of a professional identity and the bases for shared communicative practices (Hyland, 2”