TARGET ARTICLE WITH COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE A shift from diffuse to focal cortical activity with development

By Sarah Durston, Matthew C. Davidson, Nim Tottenham, Adriana Galvan, J. Spicer, John A. Fossella. 2006

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10167269fb1135d730432e776d4b6ca4bd6fa14c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Review of Adversity, The Amygdala and the Hippocampus: A Consideration of Developmental Timing (2009, unknown): “These types of studies are diffi cult and costly, but provide valuable information about developmental trajectories not often provided by cross-sectional design (Sowell et al., 2004; Durston et al., 2006; Gogtay et al., 2006; Giedd et al., 2008).”
Being Left Out: Neurobiological Correlates of Social Rejection and their Developmental Trajectory (2011, unknown): “Citation for published version (APA): Gunther Moor, B. (2011). Being left out: Neurobiological correlates of social rejection and their developmental trajectory Amsterdam”
The differentiation of executive functions in middle and late childhood: A longitudinal latent-variable analysis (2014, background): “Previous research has reported parallels in maturation of executive functions with neural development through childhood and adolescence (Amso & Casey, 2006; Durston et al., 2006).”
A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. (2008, background): “, cognitive control areas) become more focally activated with age (Durston et al., 2006).”
Neurobiology of the Adolescent Brain and Behavior (2010, unknown): “Likewise, there is mounting evidence from human functional neuroimaging studies on how subcortical systems such as the striatum and prefrontal cortex interact to give rise to risky behavior observed in adolescents.(72) Most imaging studies have focused on one or the other region showing that the pre”
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2015, unknown): “Irrespective of age, individuals who perform better on response nhibition tasks (i.e., Go/No-Go, Flanker, Stroop, Stop Signal, antiaccade) exhibit greater activation of the lPFC compared to those ho perform poorly (Durston et al., 2006; Rubia et al., 2006, 013; Velanova et al., 2009).”
Mindfulness and Inhibitory Control in Early Adolescence (2012, background): “…regions of the brain increases, indicating maturation (Rubia et al., 2006; Steinberg, 2005), whereas activity in irrelevant brain regions decreases (Durston et al., 2006), reflecting an overall linear pattern of improved cognitive control and emotion regulation as the prefrontal cortex matures…”
The development of coping. (2007, background): “This change is also apparent in neural organization, in that functions move from diffuse to more focal and fine-tuned for performance (Casey, Tottenham, Liston, & Durston, 2005; Durston et al., 2006).”
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function (2010, background): “Moreover, a longitudinal imaging study (Durston et al., 2006) reported that activation within the PFC only increased from ages 9 to 11 for specific prefrontal regions (ventral PFC) correlated with task performance.”
A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. (2010, background): “The spatially diffuse activity in the OFC reported by Galvan and colleagues relative to the NAcc serves as a functional marker of brain immaturity (Durston et al., 2006), providing additional evidence to a functional immaturity of the prefrontal cortex during the adolescent years relative to the…”