The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation

By E. P. Shulman, Ashley R. Smith, Karol Silva, G. Icenogle, N. Duell, Jason M. Chein, Laurence Steinberg. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2015

759 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Highlights • Evidence related to the dual systems model of adolescent risk taking is reviewed.• The review encompasses both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures.• Recent findings (since 2008) generally support the dual systems model.• Recommendations are made for future research directions.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e065e919c1bad18e4a501929f32441593b43bdc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Simon Ciranka
2. Wouter van den Bos

Citations in the corpus

• Adolescent risk-taking in the context of exploration and social influence (2021, background): “Thus, their uncertainty about others’ mental states in combination with their bias towards predicting negative social outcomes may contribute to adolescents’ arousal which is, in turn, thought to nudge them into reward-sensitivity and risk-taking in social contexts (Shulman et al., 2016).”
• Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology (2016, neutral): “While most research has prioritized a focus on the high reward response seen in risk-taking (Shulman et al., 2016), as noted earlier emerging literature suggests that low avoidance motivation (discounting of punishment probability) is associated with risk-taking (Casey, 2015; Van Leijenhorst et…”