Normative contestation in transitions ‘in the making’: Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry

By Boelie Elzen, Frank W. Geels, C. Leeuwis, B. V. Mierlo. 2011

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fee57a4df9981a5b44200c4cd6de1d92960c3d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Rage against the regime: Niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk (2019, background): “These normative contestations, which we figuratively refer to as ‘rage against the regime’3, may erode and destabilise the cultural legitimacy of existing regimes (Elzen et al., 2011; Roberts, 2017).”
Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions (2020, background): “Most of the selected papers focus on crop production; other agriculture sub-sectors such as animal production (Davidson et al. 2016; Elzen et al. 2011; Immink et al. 2013) and fisheries/aquaculture (Bush and Marschke 2014) remain largely underserved.”
Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates (2018, background): “Sabatier’s advocacy coalition framework [167], Kingdon’s multiple streams framework [168], political economy [105,169], and political coalition theories [170], with the aim of better understanding the conflicts and power struggles associated with the emergence and diffusion of low carbon innovations”
Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions (2015, background): “Regime-level transitions can be as minor as the technological substitution of a new means of housing pigs in The Netherlands (Elzen et al., 2011) ranging up to the replacement of horses by automobiles in North America (Geels, 2005).”
Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “It is a perspective that is increasingly applied in the context of agriculture (e.g. Blesh and Wolf 2014; Diaz et al. 2013; Elzen et al. 2011, 2012; Hinrichs 2014; Ingram 2015; Lamine 2011; Morrissey et al. 2014; Sutherland et al. 2015).”
Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study (2012, background): “Phase 2: Rising public concerns and defensive industry responses Activists coalesce into a social movement that aims to push the issue onto public agendas [30].”
Power: the missing element in sustainable consumption and absolute reductions research and action (2016, background): “Thus, the power of animal welfare organizations has been sufficient to improve the conditions for pregnant sows, for example (Elzen et al., 2011).”
Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework (2014, background): “Complaints and criticisms are often first articulated by activists or disadvantaged groups (Lounsbury et al., 2003; Elzen et al., 2011).”
The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States (2016, background): “Elzen et al. (2011) rgue that a successful ST requires not only a technically and economically feasible technology but also the alignment of these actors with political conditions such as normative pressure and regulatory openings.”
Industrial fields and countervailing power: The transformation of distributed solar energy in the United States (2013, unknown): “…the multilevel perspective tradition has increasingly acknowledged the importance of social movements and political conflict as important factors in explaining the outcomes of niche-regime dynamics (e.g., Elzen et al. 2011; Grin’s chapters in Grin, Rotmans, and Schott, 2011; Smith and Grin, 2010).”
The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review (2019, background): “While many scholars suggest that some compatibility between the practices and visions of the niche and the regime is necessary to have a successful niche-regime anchoring/linking [16,49,54,85,109], Bui et al.”
Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, unknown): “, 2005; Smith and Stirling, 2007; Genus and Coles, 2008; Hodson and Marvin, 2010): these issues were taken up in subsequent studies (Van Driel and Schot, 2005; Geels, 2006, 2014; Elzen et al., 2011; Penna and Geels, 2012; Baker et al., 2014; Kanger and Schot, 2016).”
Food as Commons or Commodity? Exploring the Links between Normative Valuations and Agency in Food Transition (2017, background): “The position is thus quite political, denouncing flaws and inequalities and having a marked normative contestation [122].”