Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition
By Jan Marco Leimeister, M. Huber, U. Bretschneider, Helmut Krcmar. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009
791 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fbebd36bc1d828eed5da619acac241486cb22ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
- Kai H. Lim
- Irwin King
- Daniel J. Veit
- Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao
- Daniel Schlagwein
- A. Parasuraman
- Nicolas Kaufmann
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction (2012, background): “Other researchers integrate the idea of crowd-sourcing into the design of collective intelligence systems, such as IT-based ideas competition systems (Leimeister et al. 2009).”
- Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis (2018, methodology): “For example, studies have been conducted on the motivations of individuals to participate in various forms of crowdsourcing (e.g., Frey et al. 2011; Jeppesen and Frederiksen 2006; Lakhani and Wolf 2005; Leimeister et al. 2009).”
- Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing (2013, background): “Zheng, Li, and Hou (2011) and Leimeister et al. (2009) both find that motivation for participation in crowdsourcing is a mix of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.”
- Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes (2011, background): “Apart from remuneration, such mechanisms are mostly specific to different applications of crowdsourcing – e.g., idea competitions (Leimeister et al., 2009), user-generated content (Brabham, 2008; Schroer and Hertel, 2009), or design competitions (Brabham, 2010) – and therefore exceed the scope of…”
- A Survey of Crowdsourcing Systems (2011, background): “Moreover, Leimeister et al. [50] proposed to crowdsource software development tasks as ideas competitions to motivate more users to support and participate.”
- - in-Progress (2012, neutral): “Of the studies that report number of participants, numbers range from as few as 127 (Leimeister et. al., 2009) to over 150,000 (Ringo, 2007).”
- Crowd-Funding: Transforming Customers into Investors through Innovative Service Platforms (2011, background): “The crowds participating in open sourcing and crowd-sourcing are motivated by such things as learning, direct compensation, self-promotion, and social benefits ( Leimeister et al. , 2009”
- A survey of the use of crowdsourcing in software engineering (2017, background): “[194] investigated the motivation of participants for IT-based idea competitions.”
- A Survey on Mobile Crowdsensing Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and Opportunities (2019, background): “An analysis of this can be found in [87]–[89].”
- More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing - A Study on Mechanical Turk (2011, background): “…and specific domains of crowdsourcing like user generated content (e.g. Schroer and Hertel (2009) about Wikipedia) or competitions (Brabham, 2008; Leimeister, Huber, Bretschneider, and Krcmar, 2009), we are not aware of research on the comparison of different motivational aspects on different…”
- Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities (2012, background): “, where companies collect innovative ideas from customers) [21,44], and in knowledge contribution, such as Wikipedia and online question and answer sites (e.”
- Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “Finally, new business models leveraging the wisdom of crowds (Surowiecki, 2004) provide new mechanisms by which firms can draw diverse and potentially valuable knowledge to the firm to support the initiation process (Leimeister, Huber, Bretschneider, & Krcmar, 2009).”